Limited

Site vs design

What limited.com.br has today, compared step by step with the design flow map. Green is what I saw on the site and matches the design; the rest is missing or different. Each step opens the reference screen in Figma.

Checked on October 28, 2026 Estúdio B · Bruno Campos Ver em português View the design flow map ↗

Tap a status to see only its steps.

What to take to the devs

  1. Create a club followed the wrong version

    The site asks for a Limited review before publishing (version B). The Oct 28 decision was version A, which publishes directly, with payout setup during creation.

  2. +1 without approval

    On the site the guest gets in without host approval. In the design the host approves. Decide which rule applies and align.

  3. Not on the site

    The whole auction, editing and canceling a published event, leaving a club, host statement and payouts, direct messages to a person and the social profile.

  4. Bugs found

    Clicking the club in the sidebar and “+ Create club” does nothing. An event shows “Free for members” and R$ 20.00 at the same time.

  5. Test data in production

    QA clubs in Explore, repeated copy and an automatic “Name's Club” for every account.

  6. Language

    The site opens in English and mixes Portuguese categories. Define the default language.

On the site, not in the design

  • Public landing page

    “Access changes everything”, events with countdowns, how it works and featured clubs. The design has no such page.

  • Open sign-up

    Anyone can create an account with Google, Apple or email. The design starts from an invite.

  • Password

    Sign-in and recovery use a password. The design uses an emailed code.

  • Automatic club

    Every account seems to get a “Name's Club”, which shows up in Explore.

  • To finish the comparison

    A test account with passes, memberships, a club with members, and permission to make test reservations and requests.